Kaje’s Komic Kreviews!: Jurassic Park: Redemption #1

There is a meme that goes on in comics classes that you don’t have to be a good drawer to be a comic artist. This is false and misleading. It’s true that you don’t have to have Katsuhiro Otomo level skillz, but if your artwork is both poorly rendered and boring, it’s probably best that you stick with poetry jams. Or in this case, fanfiction.net.

Yesterday I saw the first issue of Jurassic Park: Redemption and, being the classy connoisseur of the franchise, squealed like a ecstatic guinea pig while fishing for change to buy it.

Here is the cover art by Frank Miller. Cool, eh?

Alas, Frank Miller just did the cover, while the actual comic is penciled by Nate Van Dyke. They ought to make up some sort of platitude about how book covers can potentially mislead you as to the quality of the book.  This is what you find inside JP:R.

I’m not complaining about scientific accuracy, this is Jurassic Park after all. I’m complaining about oh my god that’s the most awful splash page I’ve ever seen in my life. Was Nate Van Dyke shanghaied into doing this project and did the worst job he could do on purpose? Did he ask a friend if he could borrow a Jurassic Park DVD and somehow ended up with a 50’s man-in-a-rubber-suit dinosaur flick? You’d think if you were doing a Jurassic Park comic, the first thing you’d ask a potential artist is “can you draw dinosaurs competently?” That’s kind of the whole reason for JP’s existence. I’ve seen harlequin babies that were easier on the eye.

It doesn’t get much better, and it’s not just the dinosaurs that suffer. Everything is just so freaking ugly. The human characters have no life to them whatsoever. Sometimes the art doesn’t fit the text or isn’t continuous with the panels proceeding it. For example, one panel shows a truck driver leaving to take a whizz in the bushes; the next panel he’s being hurled from the top of his trailer.

Mr. Van Dyke is of the school of scratchy dry brush artwork style that is typical of the grungy horror comic, the kind that usually feature zombies and middle-of-nowhere truckstops and people wearing flannel. I’m not a big fan of that style even in those kind of comics. The Jurassic Park series isn’t grungy. It’s sleek and adventurous. It’s both the Lost World and the World of Tomorrow. Jurassic Park is a John Williams score, this comic is a crappy hellbilly band. I don’t care if this comic takes place in rural Texas, it just doesn’t fit.

The artwork’s pretty much ruined this for me, but let’s hash the plot anyway. It’s 13 years after the events of the first movie. Lexx Murphy is the CEO of Lexxcrops (hee!) and is anti-Jurassic Park. Tim Murphy is in charge of grandpa’s company and also seems to want to get JP running again. Meanwhile, there’s a secret corral of dinosaurs being kept in Glen Rose Texas.Which is being run by a guy who was eaten by a T-Rex in the second movie. Even though this takes place after the third. I guess he was bitten by a mosquito which was fossilized in amber and they cloned him back. Or maybe Lexx and Tim were DEAD THE WHOLE TIME!!!

Speaking of Glen Rose and speaking of redemption, this comic would’ve totally redeemed itself if it took a dig at Glen Rose’s creationist infestation. Alas! Maybe they’re saving it for a later issue.

The first issue ends with a stupid-looking shape-shifting Carnotaurus breaking loose and eating various large mammals. I wish you well on your mammal eating adventures, Fake-notaurus. I’m afraid I can’t bring myself to accompany you.


6 Responses to “Kaje’s Komic Kreviews!: Jurassic Park: Redemption #1”

  1. 1 Marty
    June 29, 2010 at 10:48 pm

    I ought to make up some sort of platitude about how comic book reviewers can potentially mislead you as to whether they are stating their own opinion or ripping off someone else’s. You ripped off IGN’s review about Van Dyke’s art: http://comics.ign.com/articles/110/1101498p1.html

    As a reviewer, shouldn’t you be able to make up your own adjectives and also know that it’s the colorist, rather than the artist who did a very poor job? Look at Van Dyke’s black and white versions here: http://n8vandyke.wordpress.com/2010/06/23/jurassic-park-1-in-stores-now/
    It’s obvious after looking at his work that the colorist deserves the bad review.

    • July 3, 2010 at 2:45 pm

      How so? The only similarity I see is pointing out LexxCrops, which was a pretty glaring item that anyone could ntoice by themselves.

      And do you really think I can’t tell the difference between pencils and colors? I’m sorry, but Nate’s pencils you provided are exactly what I’m talking about. Although I probably should have ripped on the colorist’s poop-and-pee schemes, just to be fair.

      • July 3, 2010 at 3:16 pm

        That, and the word “competently”.

        Everyone thinks the splash page looks like horribly foreshortened rubber suits. Me, the friend I went comic shopping with, other reviewers. There’s a difference between “plagiarism” and “dude obviously and inarguably dropped the ball on that splash page.”

        I reread some of my old Topps “Raptor” JP spinoff comics after this one. The drawings could be silly and inaccurate (and of course it was the nineties and the colors were appropriately loud and gaudy), but they worked. The humans were expressive and the dinosaurs (if a bit cartoony) had life and anatomy. They didnt make you groan audibly. We relied on the story for that.

  2. 4 W.
    July 4, 2010 at 7:11 pm

    Like Johnny and other reviewers I was very disappointed, and had the same thoughts as everyone as well.

    Although the colors weren’t that great, it all begins with the penciling, take he splash page of the raptors for instance. The raptors do look like men in Raptor suits (and if having that thought/opinions makes me unoriginal or a plagiarist then let it be so because its the blatant-blinding truth); the anatomy is all wrong (dropped the ball is right). If anything the artists should have spent some quality time at a museum to get the base bone structure anatomy for the creatures. Even without color these drawings suck.

    It all begins with the pencil artist, and although the colorist deserves a bad review too, the pencil artist deserves the worse review.

    and Marty…you think you didn’t make up some sort of platitude, when that’s all you did; a platitude is a trite, meaningless, biased, or prosaic statement that is presented as if it were significant and original…i.e: you and what you wrote, Marty…

    • July 4, 2010 at 7:28 pm

      One time when I was younger I went nice-clothes shopping with mom, and she told me that a plaid shirt would work for both casual and nice occasions. “Just remember that- ‘when in doubt, go with plaid’.”

      I asked her if that was a plaid-itude.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Donate to the Kaje!

My Zazzle Store

My Spreadshirt Store

Help a broke blogger and buy some NSFW merch at my Spreadshirt store!


June 2010
« May   Jul »
Join the best atheist themed blogroll!

Tweetin’ twootin’:


%d bloggers like this: